W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2003

RE: H1

From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:14:57 -0000
To: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BFECLKEDIHDIPFDEBCFNGELCDKAA.nigel@miswebdesign.com>

Thanks all for your replies. I know how I'm going to present this now.

Cheers,
Nigel

MIS Web Design
http://www.miswebdesign.com/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf
> Of Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
> Sent: 12 February 2003 22:12
> To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
> Cc: www-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: H1
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, we usually do the same here : 
> 
> 	<title> = "Royal Holloway : <contents of H1>"
> 	<h1> = "<whatever>
> 
> but there are cases (admittedly far less common), where 
> <title> does not echo <h1>, and there are two or more
> <h1>s.
> 
> ** Phil.
> --------
> Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote:
> > 
> > As I said "semantically the same or near enough".
> > 
> > For example, on my site I have a format like this:
> > 
> > <title>MIS Web Design: Title of this document</title>
> > 
> > <h1>Title of this document</h1>
> > 
> > The <title> may be used to add additional information that helps with
> > indexing in bookmarks lists, search engine results etc. Further 
> information
> > that is more site related than document related but 
> semantically they are
> > the same in relation to the content of that page.
> > 
> > Nigel
> 
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:14:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT