- From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:07:00 -0000
- To: "Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, <www-html@w3.org>
But if they're unrelated shouldn't they be on separate pages in theory? > -----Original Message----- > From: ssyreeni@cc.helsinki.fi [mailto:ssyreeni@cc.helsinki.fi]On Behalf > Of Sampo Syreeni > Sent: 12 February 2003 22:04 > To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design > Cc: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]; www-html@w3.org > Subject: RE: H1 > > > On 2003-02-12, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design uttered to Philip TAYLOR...: > > >In that case should it not be given a single <h1> with <h2>s for the 2 > >sections? > > No. If you have two topics of equal importance without a common unifying > one, you'd label them both and concatenate. If both of the topics are at > the highest heading level of a page, you'd end up with two parallel H1's. > -- > Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111 > student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front > openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:06:55 UTC