W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2003

Re: H1

From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:47:25 +0000
Message-ID: <3E4AC0ED.AA96B480@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org

I would argue not if you regard H1 <> Title ...
** Phil.
--------
Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote:
> 
> In that case should it not be given a single <h1> with <h2>s for the 2
> sections?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] [mailto:P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk]
> > Sent: 12 February 2003 21:43
> > To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
> > Cc: www-html@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: H1
> >
> >
> > Yes, if the sections are sufficiently short (and closely
> > related) to justify having two or more sections on a single
> > web page ...
> >
> > Philip Taylor, RHBNC
> > --------
> > Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there ever a situation where a document should/could have
> > more than one
> > > H1 element, I would say there isn't.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Nigel
> > >
> > > MIS Web Design
> > > http://www.miswebdesign.com/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 16:47:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT