Christoph Päper wrote: >>22. I am still completely opposed to the l element. >> The manipulation of this element in wysiwyg editors will >> be too hard in comparison with the existing <br> in HTML4. > > > OTOH the manipulation via DOM and CSS is much easier. What's more important? (a) the l element is purely presentational: it _is_ a line. It's not less presentational than <br/>. (b) it is useful only when you have a list of adjacent lines. So it's basically a list (ul/ol) with list items (li) having no marker and no wrapping. (c) using ul/ol/li instead of l makes it MUCH easier to number lines since you have a known container to reset the numbering. </Daniel>Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 05:53:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:20 GMT