Jim Dabell <jim-www-html@jimdabell.com> wrote: > What is the position of the WG regarding new elements for XHTML 2? In short, "give it a chance". That's why various proposals are mentioned as issues in the Working Draft. That doesn't guarantee at all that those proposals will be adopted, those issues simply indicate that there were such proposals, and let others comment on them. If there's sufficient support for a given proposal, it might be adopted, otherwise it will be dropped. I would say most of them would eventually be dropped, as the WG is in favor of making XHTML2 smaller and simpler, rather than bigger. Your feedback matters. P.S. Formal proposal should be sent to www-html-editor@w3.org. While the WG tries to monitor this mailing list, we cannot guarantee that every whisper on this mailing list will be recorded as an issue. I appreciate your cooperation. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web ConsortiumReceived on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 08:21:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:31 GMT