On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Tantek [ISO-8859-1] Çelik wrote: > On 4/5/03 1:32 PM, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Tantek [ISO-8859-1] ?lik wrote: >>> People will write XHTML2 that "happens to work" in current/legacy browsers >>> that don't actually have any support for XHTML2, kind of like people are now >>> writing/sending XHTML1 that "happens to work" in current/legacy browsers >>> that don't actually have any support for XHTML1. >> >> With XHTML1, that was encouraged by the specs explicitly allowing it. I >> hope it will not be encouraged with XHTML2. > > It doesn't matter whether it will be encouraged or not - people will do it > if they can get it to "work". I think it has _some_ effect. But granted, probably not much. Oh well. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 12:27:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:31 GMT