On 4/5/03 1:06 PM, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Tantek [ISO-8859-1] ?lik wrote: >> >> This is true, except for the fact that even when people start using XHTML2, >> they will start by writing "backwards compatible" XHTML2. > > Assuming that the HTML WG does keep using a different namespace for XHTML2 > as for XHTML1, and assuming the HTML WG makes it clear that only XML > namespaces are allowed for XHTML2, then I'm not sure what you mean by > backwards compatible XHTML2. People will write XHTML2 that "happens to work" in current/legacy browsers that don't actually have any support for XHTML2, kind of like people are now writing/sending XHTML1 that "happens to work" in current/legacy browsers that don't actually have any support for XHTML1. TantekReceived on Saturday, 5 April 2003 16:30:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:31 GMT