W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Feedback on XHTML 2.0 WD (20030131)

From: Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:06:43 +0200
To: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-html-000A@earth.li>, <www-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200304022206.44625.Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[Note for duplicate mail:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/uma-01.04.03-000
Zahlreiche Mails müssen nun ein zweites Mal gesendet werden. Sorry für 
Duplikate.
Many mails must be sent a second time. Sorry for duplicates.]


Am Montag, 31. März 2003 23:20 schrieb Tim Bagot:
> At 2003-03-31T21:37+0200, Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:-
>
> > I agree with Frank, the title element must stay.
>
> I'll go further: I'd like to see a richer content model for it. Why, for
> example, must the title be entirely in one language, with no abbreviations
> or quotations? Is the prohibition on markup merely a sop to lazy scrapers?
I agree.

The title should be of content model Inline instead of #PCDATA.
To generate the title's content for a window title, a user agent should use
something like an XPath expression .//text() on the title node.

Since the title discussion only is for XHTML 2.0 and newer, and since the meta
changed completely, robots / spiders / crawlers for search engines need to be
reprogrammed anyway, so this should be no problem for these either.



Bye
- --
ITCQIS GmbH
Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter
Telefon: +49  (0)89  27 37 04 37
Telefax: +49  (0)89  27 37 04 39
E-Mail: Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com
WWW: http://www.itcqis.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+i0LTzu6h7O/MKZkRAgn5AKDBa3Gkq7cXrQuLO/GF6rDDxoHGBQCgn/Vz
ERHk0zX28R5+rBai0qYoG7s=
=GTMA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 15:07:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT