- From: Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 17:39:25 +0100
- To: "William F. Hammond" <hammond@math.albany.edu>
- CC: Lachlan Cannon <luminosity@members.evolt.org>, www-html@w3.org
I was not arguing against the use of <em> within <em>,
but rather against the misuse of <em> where (a variant
of) <quote> is required. The LaTeX example is clearly
artificial, but realistic examples can easily be created.
** Phil.
--------
William F Hammond wrote:
[snip]
> Doesn't it depend on whether XHTML, version 2, is to be (A) a clone of
> a fine-grained document type such as TEI.2 -- in which case probably
> yes -- or (B) a generalized layout document type, with content level
> modeling of abstract_layout_ -- in which case I would like to cite a
> working LaTeX excerpt from the LaTeX Project's
>
> <eval>kpsewhich sample2e.tex</eval>
>
> (with a small modification):
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{document}
>
> In printing, text is usually emphasized with an
> \emph{italic}
> type style.
>
> \emph{
> A long segment of text can also be emphasized
> in this way. Text within such a segment can be
> given \emph{additional} emphasis.
> }
>
> \end{document}
>
> -- Bill
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 12:39:39 UTC