W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > October 2002

Re: why not valid? HTML 4.01 strict

From: Gannon J. Dick <gdick@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:21:14 -0600
Message-ID: <002c01c28112$ae19dc40$3daf2e04@home2>
To: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "Roland Bluethgen" <calocybe@web.de>, <www-html@w3.org>

Sometimes I can't help but wonder if signature quotes aren't actually
inserted on purpose
(yours too Terge Bless).  I'm sure Mark Twain would be happy to  included
Congress, People
who launch many windows, Spammers etc.  ...

Perhaps having HTML 4.01 Strict a pop-up free zone would not be a bad thing.
MT would have
said so, I think.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
To: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com>
Cc: "Roland Bluethgen" <calocybe@web.de>; <www-html@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: why not valid? HTML 4.01 strict


>
> > What does this mean then:
> >
> > target A, AREA, BASE, FORM, LINK %FrameTarget; #IMPLIED   L render in
> > this frame
>
> See that "L" before "render in this frame"?  Read the legend on that
> page... "L" == "Loose" == "Transitional only"
>
> Boris
> --
> There is no distinctly American criminal class except
> Congress.
>                       -- Mark Twain
>
>
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 14:21:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:53 GMT