Dear Cyril Some here may not but I find your posts amusing, but I do (I hope they are meant to be). >But it isn't a traditional, human date and it isn't the new, >next standard, date (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssTZD). I can't remember >how many those thoroughly researched standards for dates >existed in my life. Where they are now? It is in SQL. Although its not identical the ANSI/ISO SQL-92 datetime type is in the format 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS'. I believe this predates SQL-92 but I'm only young so I couldn't swear by it. Anyway all relational databases that I have encountered agree on this format and it makes a heap of sense to me. Cheers MarkReceived on Friday, 29 November 2002 01:37:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:18 GMT