Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML

> isn't secure, he or she could trie an dictionary or brute-force attack, but
> is is more secure, and I think that's a good thing.

You don't need a dictionary attack.  You have a plain text equivalent which
you can inject into a an HTTP request without knowing the actual password.

> Another idea, maybe make something like a "checksum" value in the type
> attribute in the  <INPUT> tag, which takes a checksum of all data?

This is definitely outside the scope of HTML.  It's also already in MIME,
upon which HTTP is based, although Content-MD5 is not in the HTTP specs
that I've actually seen.