* Terje Bless wrote: >See also my response to Karl-Ove Hufthammer on this subject. The HTML 4.01 >Recommendation appears very clear in it's intent on this issue. The SGML >Declaration does not reflect the prohibitions described in the prose. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Recommendations at most. >>The W3C MarkUp Validator may warn authors using such features if you >>like it to, without any change to the specification. > >As was made abundantly clear on this very issue, the second we attempt to >apply checks that exceede what we have mandate for from a Recommendation >the complaints will come rolling in. Without mandate -- from an errata to >the HTML Recommendation, a new version of HTML4, or at least a Note from >the HTML WG to support it -- the W3C MarkUp Validator _cannot_ apply these >checks in any way that is actually useful. "Warning: ..." is less useful than "Error: ..."?Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 22:59:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:29 GMT