RE: Is this legal XHTML 1.1?

Ian Hickson wrote:

> > If the document is served as text/html, it's tag soup anyway.
> 
> Exactly. So using an XML variant is pretty pointless.

Pointless only from the p.o.v of XMLish interpretations of common Uas.  

That such a document can be authored, worked on, queried, transformed,
etc. with the exploding universe of XML tools makes this endeavor FAR
from pointless.


/Jelks

Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 10:00:13 UTC