on 21-08-2002 12:10, Chris Mannall at chris.mannall@hecubagames.com wrote: > Regardless of which side you fall on the "hr is structure" versus "hr is > presention" argument, these attributes are clearly all presentational > and therefore undesirable. The general consensus is that XHTML should > have nothing to do with presentation beyond linking to an external > stylesheet or declaring an internal stylesheet. > > Everything you've suggested here can be easily achieved with CSS: > > hr { > margin-top:5px; margin-bottom:5px; > width:75%; > border-width:1px; border-style:groove; > } I think that default presentational attributes are very important and must be suggested by W3C with the proposal of spreading 1. a good visual design education 2. a well structured information architecture 3. and a right use of specific words [avoiding the use of generic words in favor of technical words related to each knowledge field (i.e typography, graphic design, information architecture, bibliography, etc.)] The precise definition of a presentation standard for each element is very important for a correct rendering in each browser/media, avoiding differences in the renderings as happened in the past between MSIE and Netscape (i.e. button dimensions, window dimensions, etc.) What do you think?Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 09:07:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:52 GMT