RE: "alt" attribute required by XHTML 1.0

Hello,

> -----Original Message-----
> "Christian Wolfgang Hujer" <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com> wrote:
> 
> > - requirement of the alt attribute for the <img/>-element is 
> not new. For
> > HTML 4.01, HTML 4, HTML 3.2, HTML 3.0 and HTML 2.0 I am sure they also
> > required the alt attribute for valid documents.
> 
> Just for the record, the alt attribute on the img element was NOT
> required in HTML 3.2, (never-standardized) HTML 3.0 and HTML 2.0.
> Same for HTML i18n (RFC 2070).  It was changed in HTML 4.0.
yeah, sorry, I was wrong about that.
HTML 3.2:
<!ATTLIST IMG
        src     %URL     #REQUIRED  -- URL of image to embed --
        alt     CDATA    #IMPLIED   -- for display in place of image --
[...]
        >
Sorry.

[cut]
> Regards,
> -- 
> Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
> W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Thank you for your corrections about that.

Greetings

Christian