* Terje Bless wrote: >>> As of February 2001, the HTML WG has taken no official position on >>> what MIME media type should be used to describe XHTML 1.0 or any >>> other XHTML based language, >> >>That's quite wrong, text/xml and application/xml are appropriate. > >Just to clarify, that wasn't my statement; However, you later state | At the moment, XHTML does not exist as far as MIME is concerned, except | insofar as it conforms to the backwards compatibility guidelines; in which | case it should be labelled as "text/html" and validate as such. As wrong as the ID... :-) EOT. -- Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 22:31:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:14 GMT