Re: client side includes

• From: Daniel Hiester <alatus@earthlink.net>
• Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:07:12 -0800
• To: "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <00c201c08684$4caa2d00$102eb3d1@sol>

Okay, after I finally took the time to read
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.5 , I finally understand
why OBJECT is the way to do client-side includes, and not LINK. I thought
object was supposed to be the replacement for iframe.

Daniel

Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2001 23:01:57 UTC