* Hague, Alex wrote: >What happens then when implementations add extensions which may be included >in later standards. This is a subject to the specification writers. The DOM recommendation made no restrictions on extensions or any forward compatibility. >Does that implementation now dictate what the next standard is, or does the >implementation have to also include support for the new standard, if it is >different to their implementation (and how likely is that to happen ?) ? No, the implementation does not dictate in any way. No, the implementation does not need to support the new standard. -- Björn Höhrmann ^ mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de ^ http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 ° Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 ° http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll # PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 # http://learn.to/quote [!]e --++~ C_.._a_.._r_.._p_.._e_.._ _.._N_.._o_.._c_.._t_.._e_.._m ~++--Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 20:49:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:45 GMT