W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2001

Re: FRAMEBORDER attribute?

From: Steve Doig <Steve.Doig@shihad.zzn.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:08:57 +0800
Message-ID: <003801c08c47$c1fe2980$6feefea9@oemcomputer>
To: "Dave J Woolley" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>, <www-html@w3.org>
Why should you move away from frames? - I thought thay were valid useful
constructs.

Cheers,

SD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave J Woolley" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
To: <www-html@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: FRAMEBORDER attribute?


> > From: Gabriele Caniglia [SMTP:mailing.lists@garr.com]
> >
> > Actually I can't understand the problem with the FRAMEBORDER
> > attribute, since it is part of HTML 4.01:
> >
> > ><http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html#adef-frameborder>
> > >
> > >frameborder = 1|0 [CN]
> [DJW:]
> Only for frame, not for frameset.  Note, you should have been
> trying to move away from frames since the 4.0 specification
> was released.  Most of the longstanding sites already have.
>
> This is valid:
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN"
>             "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/frameset.dtd">
> <title>test</title>
> <frameset rows="35%,*">
> <frame src="fred" frameborder="0">
> <frame src="jim" frameborder="0">
> </frameset>
>
> --
> --------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
>
> >
>
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2001 07:13:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:45 GMT