W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Microsoft DTDs (was: HTML Validation Service - Better Explanation/Link - What document types?)

From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: <www-validator@w3.org>, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.32.0104231107110.15486-100000@paddington>
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Terje Bless wrote:

> There are about a gazillion possible DOCTYPEs so listing all of them is not
> really very constructive. What you /should/ be using is one of the DOCTYPEs
> (i.e. HTML versions) defined by the W3C. You can learn more about that here
> <URL:http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/>.

I would personally recommend using one of the HTML version accepted by the
ISO, such as ISO/IEC 15445:2000


The ISO has more of claim to be a standards body than the W3C.  This is
not to put down the W3C.  ISO-HTML is really just a slightly modified
version of the W3C's HTML 4.0, so the W3C really did all the development

- -- 
Russell O'Connor                        roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 14:16:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:56 UTC