W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > October 2000

bad address for XHTML editor?

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 10:14:14 -0400
Message-Id: <200010211410.KAA25172@hesketh.net>
To: www-html@w3.org
I cut-and-pasted the address from the XHTML CR, and got the message below.

It's possible that non-members get a 'user unknown' response, but it seems
pretty unusual.

>Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:51:37 -0400
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@hesketh.net>
>X-Received-From: MAILER-DAEMON
>X-Delivered-To: simonstl
>To: <simonstl@simonstl.com>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>The original message was received at Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:51:27 -0400
>from ith1-3e6.twcny.rr.com []
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to w3.org.:
>>>> RCPT To:<w3c-html-editor@w3.org>
><<< 550 <w3c-html-editor@w3.org>... User unknown
>550 <w3c-html-editor@w3.org>... User unknown
>Reporting-MTA: dns; hesketh.net
>Received-From-MTA: DNS; ith1-3e6.twcny.rr.com
>Arrival-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:51:27 -0400
>Final-Recipient: RFC822; w3c-html-editor@w3.org
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.1.1
>Remote-MTA: DNS; w3.org
>Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <w3c-html-editor@w3.org>... User unknown
>Last-Attempt-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:51:36 -0400
>Return-Path: <simonstl@simonstl.com>
>Received: from zingo (ith1-3e6.twcny.rr.com [])
>	by hesketh.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA24182;
>	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:51:27 -0400
>Message-Id: <200010211351.JAA24182@hesketh.net>
>X-Received-From: simonstl@simonstl.com
>X-Sender: simonstl@
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 
>Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:54:50 -0400
>To: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
>From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
>Subject: Diff-marked CR?
>Cc: w3c-html-editor@w3.org
>In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010211244480.10271-100000@alcapone.intouch.
> co.za>
>References: <1240059604-849747047@psdbay.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>There's a new diff-marked version of the _Modularization in XHTML_
>Candidate Recommendation:
>But it doesn't look like the diff-marking worked.  Am I just crazy?  It looks
>like the whole front is marked as a diff, and then almost nothing else
>except a few qname parameter entity names.  It's weird where the first
>piece ends, especially.
>I don't think it's a simple markup glitch - <span class="diff-new"> is all
>over the place.  It just doesn't make a lot of sense where it appears, at
>least in the opening.  (The whitespace in the source view is also weird,
>with every word on a separate line, but that doesn't affect the output.)  I
>get the same results in both IE and NS.
>I hope there's some easy way to fix this...
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2000 10:10:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:55 UTC