W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2000

Re: The Future Of XHTML

From: Ian Graham <igraham@smaug.java.utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 10:10:45 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
cc: Sean Palmer <sean_b_palmer@yahoo.com>, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10006221007480.111079-100000@smaug.java.utoronto.ca>

I believe that Sean is seeing a bug in the W3C HTML validator -
It appears to have problems with XHTML that is processed as
text/xml as opposed to text/html. I quote a test case at:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2000AprJun/0143.html

that demonstrates this problem.

Ian
--
Ian Graham ......................... Centre for Academic Technology
i a n   d o t   g r a h a m    a t    u t o r o n t o   d o t   c a



On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Dan Connolly wrote:

> 
> 
> Sean Palmer wrote:
> > 
> > Hello everyone,
> > Has anyone noticed that valid XHTML can sometimes not
> > be valid XML?
> 
> No; this cannot be the case, by definition of XHTML.
> 
> > Try it: simply change the extension of a
> > valid XHTML document to xml, or change the MIME type
> > at what ever server you have, and run it through a
> > validator. Doesn't work, does it?
> 
> Do you have an example? I'm quite sure that
> every valid XHTML document is a valid XML document.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2000 10:10:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT