At 21:58 30.01.00 -0500, Vidiot wrote: >I just printed the XHTML 1.0 document and an floored by the >following: [...] One discussion (out of many out there no doubt) you might want to read is one at buzz.builder.com, "XHTML: The Web's Saving Grace?" <http://buzz.builder.com/cgi-bin/WebX?14@179.PwkRahmHiI4^37592@.ee7b2bd/0>. XHTML 1.0 is in my opinion extremely backwards compatible, if the original pages were HTML 4.0 conforming and didn't use depreciated features. You would need to tidy up the HTML documents, but that is an automatic process. I know by experience that handcoding XHTML is no harder and not noticably slower than handcoding HTML, but it may take some time getting used to (less if you followed the hints and recommendations of HTML). JonnyReceived on Monday, 31 January 2000 14:12:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:20 GMT