RE: errata, http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1

From: <JOrendorff@ixl.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:50:40 -0500 Message-ID: <CD8E2CDBC6D0D111ACB900805FBBD97E02630100@mem-131.ixl.com> To: www-html@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:19 GMT

> The strict DTD lacks provision for attribute "target" which 
> is likely to discourage many from ultimate transition to
> XHTML. I realize there may well be technical reasons for this
> that lie beyond my comprehension of the specification.

There are no frames in the strict DTD, so naturally "target"
is not there.  This is the case in HTML 4.01 as well.

The &apos; entity makes sense in XHTML.  The XML rec requires
XML processors (including XHTML browsers) to recognize &apos;
anyway.  Or rather, that's my reading of the spec.  The wording
is vague:

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
Section 2.4 paragraph 5

-- 
Jason Orendorff