W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2000

RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?)

From: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:21:57 -0500
To: <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NBBBICMNIPCICMKJECCBIEFPDGAA.jelks@jelks.nu>
Murray Altheim wrote:

> You're not reading what I wrote, nor what is clearly in the specs: we have
> not removed the ability to include style information in the instance, since
> the <style> element is still available in XHTML. We have not even threatened
> its family or anything, no horse heads next to the pillow.

(You're right as to embedded -- I had been reading the XHTML Basic draft, which
only permits CSS to be used if it is LINKed and got confused.  My apologies.
OK, so embedded CSS is still in the Style module.)

Back to inline styling.  Let's say, while using your CSS-aware authoring tool,
you select a word and press the "change text color ... to red" button.  With the
style attribute, it would do something like

	<span style="color: red">Hello</span>

*Without* that attribute, what does it have to do?  It has to generate a CLASS
(or ID) of "colorred" in the stylesheet, and change the above to:

	<span class="colorred">Hello</span>

Is the second version really so much more advanced than the first, that the
first gets banished to the Halls of Infamy to rot with the chained corpses of
FONT and CENTER?  When said Halls don't even include the B and I elements?


/Jelks
Received on Monday, 21 February 2000 16:24:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:42 GMT