W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2000

Re: URL better than FPI

From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:01:54 -0500 (EST)
To: W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.1000221100041.9294A-100000@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, David Carlisle wrote:

> Under whose rules? I can see _nothing_ in the XML spec that puts any
> constraints on the public identifier except that it consists of PubidChar.
> So as long as the URI is encoded in (say) utf8 and then %HH encode any
> disallowed characters, it would appear that that would be usable as
> the public identifier (although it would break any sgml based system
> expecting an FPI)

I thought every valid & well-formed XML document was a valid SGML
document?

-- 
Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
       <http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/~roconnor/>
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Received on Monday, 21 February 2000 10:01:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:42 GMT