W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2000

Re: HTTP headers

From: Michael Hamm <msh210@is7.nyu.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:54:08 -0500 (EST)
To: www-html@w3.org
cc: connolly@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002171850160.10838-100000@is7.nyu.edu>
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote, in part:
<BQ>
> I find it interesting that in both styles.html and scripts.html, the HTML4
> spec defines HTTP headers. Is that within the scope of the spec?

No. The HTTP editor read us the riot act on this one.
I spent some time thinking about the cheapest way to
fix it, but I dind't close the loop when work on HTML 4.01
started. Oops.
</BQ>

How about saying "this MUST be done EITHER using http headers, as it's up
to the http wg [or ietf, or iso, or whomever; I really don't know -msh210]
to define OR using <meta name..."?

Michael Hamm
BA, Math, Sept. '00
msh210@nyu.edu
http://www.crosswinds.net/~msh210/
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2000 18:54:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:42 GMT