W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2000

RE: RSAC stupidity

From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:45:42 -0800
Message-Id: <v0422083bb4bd51ec623d@[63.193.119.97]>
To: www-html@w3.org
At 01:58p -0500 02/01/00, rev-bob@gotc.com wrote:
>Still, grit your teeth and run through the process once.  At each 
>question, view the associated definitions and copy 'em off to your 
>hard drive.  When you finally get the META tag, check out the 
>embedded URL - as I recall, that points to a concise copy of the 
>rating levels.  Combine that with the definitions of the shorthand 
>terms ("what constitutes "strong" vs. "vulgar" language?"), and you 
>can plug in your own ratings with a little practice.

Thanks, Bob -- you recall correctly, and now I have saved it all to 
disk. I also determined that the true/false in the rating is whether 
it's for a branch or a single page. Now I can go write a meta 
generator program for MacOS. :-)


-Walter
  if ya want something done right, ya gotta do it yourself!
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2000 22:47:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:42 GMT