W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2000

Re: RSAC stupidity

From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:40:35 -0800
Message-Id: <v04220838b4bcbae4e626@[63.193.119.97]>
To: www-html@w3.org
At 07:50a -0800 02/01/00, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
>Too bad RSAC.org is IMPOSSIBLE to use. It's one of the worst sites 
>out there. Even the "Contact Us" link requires JavaScript. Clueless 
>idiots there.
>
>Hmm... after going through about 10 billion levels of frames (gack), 
>I finally reached <http://www.rsac.org/content/register/>. Why did 
>they bury it so far away? They should link directly to it from the 
>home page. Idiots.
>
>Oh geez, even that part requires JavaScript. I hate RSAC.
>I give up. If any people block my site, it'll be their loss, and RSAC's fault.

I was too curious to give up. <g>

To register an entire site or a branch of a site:
   <http://www.rsac.org/content/register/general.asp?branch=true>

To register only a single page:
   <http://www.rsac.org/content/register/general.asp?branch=false>

You can actually use those pages in Lynx! :-)

There are 4 sets of questions (nudity/sex/violence/language), at the 
end of which are the terms of use, followed by the META code (oddly 
it uses "http-equiv" rather than "name" -- I dunno what's up with 
that).

Hey, RSAC... was that so hard? Sheesh.


-Walter
  who wonders why some people make things so much harder than necessary
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2000 11:42:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:42 GMT