W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2000

Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute

From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 17:56:33 +0200
Message-ID: <002e01c00477$eca79980$511859d5@chello.se>
To: <www-html@w3.org>
Cavre:

> On 8/12/00 at 1:15 PM Bertilo Wennergren wrote:

> > Having a util:comment attribute, however, is not the
> > same as having a comment attribute, unless the Schema
> > was universally recognised. Maybe the W3C should come
> > up with a library of Schema for people to use? (Such
> > as the one you kindly prepared for us).

> >All we need is a validator that allows for mixing of vocabularies.

> I hope I am not reading more into this than what your truly saying.
> Mixing vocabularies is a very BAD idea.  If you send me a document
> with SMGL, XHTML, XML, HTML, and your own markup even given a
> DTD it would be nearly (but not impossible) to validate all this markup
> correctly.  

I'm just talking about using XML and namespaces rules in the
correct manner.
 
> No we need to agree upon a common vocabulary and if we need 
> additional markup then we need to agree to use XML or XHTML
> with modules with a modified DTD that does validate only those
> documents that meet our needs.

Yes, that's what I was thinking of. Exactly how this should
work, and when we can start doing it, is a bit hazy to me.

#####################################################################
                         Bertilo Wennergren
                 <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
                     <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2000 12:09:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT