Sean Palmer: > Namespaces are certainly one way of doing it; however, > it doesn't seem as if any provisions are being made to > combine the Schema spec. with the (X)HTML spec. - i.e. > it doesn't validate on the main XHTML validator. But such things will work in XHTML 1.1 - I believe. > Having a util:comment attribute, however, is not the > same as having a comment attribute, unless the Schema > was universally recognised. Maybe the W3C should come > up with a library of Schema for people to use? (Such > as the one you kindly prepared for us). All we need is a validator that allows for mixing of vocabularies. ##################################################################### Bertilo Wennergren <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo> <bertilow@hem.passagen.se> #####################################################################Received on Saturday, 12 August 2000 07:14:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:22 GMT