W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2000

RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute

From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:54:54 +0100
Message-ID: <81E4A2BC03CED111845100104B62AFB5824914@stagecoach.bts.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org
	From:	Bertilo Wennergren [SMTP:bertilow@hem.passagen.se]

	And how would I do that with my image example in XHTML?


[DJW:]  Either define a reviewstatus attribute, or define a 
metadata attribute that looks something like:

metadata="reviewstatus:....."

but always subject to researching for mechanisms that already exist
and can be adopted.

-- 
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.


> -----Original Message-----
> Sent:	Friday, August 11, 2000 3:35 PM
> To:	Dave  J Woolley; www-html@w3.org
> Subject:	RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
> 
> 
> Dave J Woolley:
> 
> > > From:	Bertilo Wennergren [SMTP:bertilow@hem.passagen.se]
> 
> > > And then, in XHTML used as XML, applications can be made to _act_
> > > upon the content of comment attributes!
> > [DJW:]  
> 
> > "Structured" comments are a hack for languages without
> > proper meta-data mechanism.  If you want meta-data,
> > define proper meta-data.
> 
> 
> #####################################################################
>                           Bertilo Wennergren
>                   <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
>                       <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
> #####################################################################
Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 11:55:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT