W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2000

RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute

From: Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:13:12 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20000811111312-f01010601-0819bdd7@204.107.232.107>
On Friday, August 11, 2000 at 16:34, bertilow@hem.passagen.se (Bertilo Wennergren) wrote:

> And how would I do that with my image example in XHTML?

<!--
<meta name="date"      content="8/11/2000">
<meta name="author"    content="Chris Jones">
<meta name="status"    content="Review">
<meta name="reference" content="bluemoon.gif>
<meta name="comment"   content="

	The bluemoon.gif file is just a placeholder logo
	Maddy says Dave has a friend who does graphic design
	and he is going to do something fancy in exchange for
	some work he needs Dave to do (I'm not asking, I don't 
	want to know
	
	"
	>
-->

or perhaps

<?BM_COMMENT
<meta name="date"      content="8/11/2000">
<meta name="author"    content="Chris Jones">
<meta name="status"    content="Review">
<meta name="reference" content="bluemoon.gif>
<meta name="comment"   content="

	The bluemoon.gif file is just a placeholder logo
	Maddy says Dave has a friend who does graphic design
	and he is going to do something fancy in exchange for
	some work he needs Dave to do (I'm not asking, I don't 
	want to know
	
	"
	>
?>

I like the second more than the first but the first is probably safer from
the point of view of backwards compatability. Some browsers out there don't
handle PI's very gracefully.

-- 
Christian Smith  |  csmith@barebones.com  |  http://web.barebones.com

He who dies with the most friends... Is still dead!
Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 11:12:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT