W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2000

RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute

From: Rowland Shaw <Rowland.Shaw@seagatesoftware.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:24:36 +0100
Message-ID: <81E198609B9DD311BE0A00508B5E2984440EAC@ipsent02.camelot.seagatesoftware.com>
To: "'Bertilo Wennergren'" <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>, www-html@w3.org
I guess that's when a standard comment would suffice??

One of my critisms of C++ was that there was more than one way to comment
code...

-----Original Message-----
From: Bertilo Wennergren [mailto:bertilow@hem.passagen.se]
Sent: 11 August 2000 12:56
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute


Rowland Shaw:

> I can't see a use for it though, particularly with the CSS example as CSS
> has comments already... eg:
> <hr style="color:green;/* was blue */" />
 
> Which does kinda save on space too...
 
It does. But that's just for CSS. What about cases like these?

  <img src="image.gif" comment="replace with better image when X delivers"
/>

This comment attribute would be a core attribute available for 
all elements.

#####################################################################
                          Bertilo Wennergren
                  <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
                      <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 09:25:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:43 GMT