- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 20:48:33 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 04:51a -0400 04/29/00, Robert Knight didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus: ><x-html><!x-stuff-for-pete base="" src="" id="0"><!DOCTYPE HTML >PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> ><HTML><HEAD> ><META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type> ><META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR> ><STYLE></STYLE> ></HEAD> ><BODY bgColor=#ffffff> ><DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The <font> tag is depreciated in HTML 4.0, >however it can be very useful in one-off situations in a page. >Also style >sheets can be very annoying to work with as the <font> tag has better >cross-browser capability's </FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I ask for W3C to include the <font> tag in >HTML 5.0.</FONT></DIV> ><DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anybody else think differently / agree with >me?</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > ></x-html> You mean because it'll work in email too? -Walter who wishes HTML would be banned from email
Received on Saturday, 29 April 2000 23:49:17 UTC