W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > September 1999

RE: XHTML Comments/XHTML: One or Three Namespaces?

From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:43:32 -0700
To: "'Steven Pemberton'" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "'Ted Wugofski'" <Ted.Wugofski@OTMP.com>
Cc: <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>, <david-b@pacbell.net>, <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001101beffe5$0755a6c0$50e0fea9@w21tp>
>"The element type <font> isn't in the strict vocabulary, so strict
>should have a different namespace." would seem to be a resonable
>statement.

Steven,

Could you explain exactly what the above sentence have to do with real world
application of XHTML?  If <font> is used in a 'strict' XHTML document,
document would be invalid whether <font> is in different namespace or not.
Why do you need to have the <font> tag in a different namespace?

Don Park
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 1999 21:44:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:39 GMT