- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 23:20:41 -0500 (EST)
- To: altheim@eng.sun.com, www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999 13:20:51 -0800, Murray Altheim (altheim@eng.sun.com) wrote: > > The fact that it "works" (using your earlier idea of CSS1 being "fully > implemented") in IE doesn't mean that in an arbitrary XML document (ie., > not HTML or XHTML) you can rely on it to work correctly (interpreting > the XML DOM correctly) in other applications. Microsoft may have an XML > support for CSS (like simply allowing any element type rather than > HTML's) that suits your needs, but that hardly means that CSS is not > proprietary to HTML. As the principle editor of the CSS1 Recommendation You said it can't be relied on to work correctly. But *why* do you think it won't work correctly? What's the problem? -David L. David Baron Sophomore, Harvard (Physics) dbaron@fas.harvard.edu Links, SatPix, CSS, etc. <URL: http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/ > WSP CSS AC <URL: http://www.webstandards.org/css/ >
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 1999 23:20:45 UTC