W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 1999

Re: XHTML

From: G. James Berigan <www-html@war-of-the-worlds.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:56:42 -0600
Message-Id: <v04220800b45f15604598@[216.229.13.10]>
To: www-html@w3.org
"Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>> Quick question.  From what I've read concerning XHTML 1.0 on the "HTML
>> Home Page" <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/>), it is  my undestanding that
>> since XHTML 1.0 "is the first major change to HTML since HTML 4.0",
>> there will be no HTML 5.0 Recommendation published in the future, and
>> from this point forward all HTML-relatecd Recommendations will be
>> published as XHTML X.X.  Is this correct?  If I am misunderstanding
>> this, please clarify.

> You are correct!

Does that also mean I am imagining HTML 4.01 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html40/>?

(Though it would explain why this list is practically dead and I can get no
comment upon the issue raised at:

	<http://www.war-of-the-worlds.org/html/span-vs-group.html>

despite repeated attempts both here and in ciwah.  In it I am proposing a
change in HTML 4.01 in how the non-zero attributes ROWSPAN and COLSPAN
behave in regards to THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY, and COLGROUP, or at least a
finding of fact.)
-- 
         ,=<#)-=#  <http://www.war-of-the-worlds.org/>
    ,_--//--_,
 _-~_-(####)-_~-_  "Did you see that Parkins boy's body in the tunnels?" "Just
(#>_--'~--~`--_<#)  the photos.  Worst thing I've ever seen; kid had no face."
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 10:56:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:40 GMT