W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 1999

Re: type attr. for IMG tag

From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 15:50:03 -0800
Message-Id: <199902102347.PAA14446@mail-gw6.pacbell.net>
To: Dmitry Beransky <dberansky@ucsd.edu>, www-html@w3.org
> Is there a reason the IMG tag is missing the 'type' attribute?  It looks
> like 'type' is defined for all the other tags that reference external data
> (such as OBJECT, A, LINK, STYLE, SCRIPT), but not IMG.

(going out on a limb here) I think many of the people who make such
decisions would prefer that you retire IMG in favor of OBJECT as soon as
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 1999 18:50:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:49 UTC