W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 1999

Re: here comes the URI

From: Ignacio Javier <igjav@ctv.es>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:55:18 +0200
Message-ID: <372961E6.7263E157@ctv.es>
To: John Whelan <whelan@itp.unibe.ch>
CC: www-html@w3.org
> > Thanks for replies, I assume putting somewhere:
> > <a...href="javascript:
> > is standard to that level, the html level (still obviously not at scripting
> > level, but thet was not the question).
> In any event, you shouldn't use it, since it cripples the link for
> users without Javascript enabled in their browsers.  You should
> instead put the appropriate 'http://' URI as the href attribute (at
> least 95% of the uses of the 'javascript:' URI syntax are to open
> another page in a jazzed-up window) and add an onclick attribute whose
> value is whatever followed the 'javascript:', with ';return false'
> tacked onto the end.  It will have the same effect as the
> 'javascript:' URI syntax for JS-enabled browsers, and also make the
> link usable by the rest of the world.
> (I know this is off-topic, but if it prevents one person from breaking
> another page with the 'javascript:' URI syntax, it'll be worth it.)

Of course, and sure in IE4- and so for....
HTML 4.0 adds explicitly event support, of course and obviously.
But the case is that discussing Javascript event model, apart from being non
standard, is an another's list topic (try mozilla, but sure they are focusing on

So about the topic only one thing more: the are *author tools* that ONLY
allow explicitly one syntax for comms with html, that of the URI, so accesing
via this should be the only possible solution.
Received on Friday, 30 April 1999 03:55:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:50 UTC