Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:39:44 -0600 (CST) From: Dataweaver <email@example.com> To: "Martin J. Duerst" <firstname.lastname@example.org> cc: Jukka Korpela <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, In-Reply-To: <199803270006.JAA11994@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp> Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980326181111.19039Cemail@example.com> Subject: class inheretance (Was: Future of HTML) On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Martin J. Duerst wrote: > At 11:41 98/03/26 -0600, Dataweaver wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Jukka Korpela wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 1998 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > > > As for the best way of doing this I am not sure, but adding a > > > > <DATATYPE> tag would be one way. > > > > > > Well, a bit long name. The element for "data type markup" could be > > > called just DATA. For example, > > > <DATA TYPE="date">1998-03-26</DATA> > > > > How would this differ from <DIV class="date">? > > If you ever want to do that, I suggest you use <SPAN class="date"> > instead of DIV. > > Regards, Martin. Oh; oops... You're right. IIRC, SPAN is supposed to be the general-purpose inline element, while DIV is intended as the general-purpose block element; and the class attribute is supposed to let you specify conceptual differences amongst otherwise-identical tags. On that note, would HTML (conceptually) be the right place to introduce class "inheritance", or would that belong in CSS? I suspect the former, due to the fact that class inheritance would fundamentally be content-related, rather than presentation-related, but I'm unsure, as the only benefits that I can see relate to style-sheets (of course, the only benefits that I see for the class attribute in general involve stylesheets, so that's not a big surprise...). This is strictly hypothetical, and I'm not at all sure that it would be either practical or desirable to implement, but I'm thinking along the lines of a new element, intended strictly for use in the header, with the sole purpose of specifying relationships among various classes in the document (I do _not_ like this approach, but I can't think of a better one right now; if anyone else can, I'm all ears...). Something along the lines of: <RELATION class="date" parent="datetime"> <RELATION class="time" parent="datetime"> At that point, anything that acts on elements with the "datetime" class would also act on elements with either the "date" class or the "time" class, or both, while anything that acts specifically on elements with the "date" class would have no effect on elements with the "datetime" class or the "time" class (assuming that they also don't have the "date" class, of course...). ---- Jonathan Lang <email@example.com> ---- x ------- alias: Dataweaver --------- Webpage: http://www.io.com/~traveler /@\ The Dogma of Otherness insists GURPSnet's Benevolent Tyrant for Life ~~~ that all voices deserve a hearing, FAQ: http://www.io.com/~ftp/GURPSnet/www | that all points of view have Archive: http://www.io.com/~ftp/GURPSnet | something of value to offer. submit new files to firstname.lastname@example.org | --David Brin, "Otherness"