Re: Frames spec & the NOFRAMES tag

Tim Bagot (tim@oakley.keble.ox.ac.uk)
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 06:08:22 -0500 (EST)


Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 06:08:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Tim Bagot <tim@oakley.keble.ox.ac.uk>
To: HTML mailing list <www-html@w3.org>
cc: bhaller@apple.com
In-Reply-To: <199803041026.LAA22643@bells.igd.fhg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980304110553.13342G-100000@oakley.keble.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Frames spec & the NOFRAMES tag



On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Marcus Haas (V.Luckas wrote:

> Hmmm, can you think of any browser that supports BODY-attributes but no
> frames ?  As far as I'm concerned, the only use for the NOFRAMES-Tag is
> for text-only browsers like Lynx. If you check the attributes on BODY,
> you'll see that none of these actually apply... 

The spec. also suggests that a frames browser might (for whatever reason)
be configured not to display frames, and that it should in that case
display the contents of NOFRAMES.

Tim Bagot