Harold A. Driscoll wrote: > Much more creditable references would be the current URL specification > (check the RFC index for number) and the Internet-Draft library for the > proposed enhancements to the mailto scheme. > > My recollection is that links or copies of both documents are available at > the W3C site, likely in one of the technical documents areas. specifically: =========== http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#mailto mailto: Electronic mail address "The mailto URL scheme", P. Hoffman, L. Masinter, J. Zawinski, 02 Jan 1998. <draft-hoffman-mailto-url-04.txt> (updates URL RFC) =========== (oops! draft 4 is gone... it's now draft 5:) http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/uri/draft-hoffman-mailto-url-05.txt http://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt If the caveats Harold mentioned aren't sufficiently documented in those specs, please notify the editors. -- Dan Connolly http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Saturday, 4 July 1998 12:52:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:37 GMT