Re: More on IMG ALT (was Re: Questionable implementation of IMG

On 26 Jan 98 at 12:53, Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> 
wrote:

> Actually, it depends on the browser. Some versions of Lynx, and MSIE,
> treat <IMG SRC="foo.gif" ALT=""> the same as <IMG SRC="foo.gif"> -- the
> null attribute value is minimized to attribute absence, resulting in the
> ugly "(Image)" text being displayed. :/  The workaround is to specify
> *something*, most popularly a space (ALT=" ").

My 0.01c worth, a blank alt=" " does absolutely nothing for the 
visually-impaired surfers who rely on sound rather than sight. In my 
opinion, the W3C ought to make the ALT="description" mandatory.


ATBTY
----------
Ian Samson
Internet Systems Development (SBN/MSDN/HWG Member)
Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
Voice:  [+27(0)12] 302 2013
mailto:IDSamson@beauty.HSRC.ac.za
http://www.hsrc.ac.za/
--
Opinions expressed in this message are my own 
and do not reflect official policy of the HSRC.
--
Education is a priority over any sport because without a mind
 one cannot contribute to society -- Tiger Woods (ed. IDS)
--
An amicable relationship with colleagues is essential, but it is 
not important to make friends with them, unless they are 
exceptional people who clearly demonstrate reciprocation 
of approaches.
--

Received on Tuesday, 27 January 1998 01:57:25 UTC