What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
Rob (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:41:21 -0500
Message-Id: <199709250611.CAA01129@unix.asb.com>
From: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: Chris Maden <crism@ora.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:41:21 -0500
CC: www-html@w3.org
In-reply-to: <199709231431.KAA09074@geode.ora.com>
Subject: What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
On 23 Sep 97, Chris Maden <crism@ora.com> wrote:
> [..]
> In English typography, at least, foreign words should always be
> italicized; the only ones that aren't are loanwords that aren't really
> foreign any more.
>
> I believe that this is a kind of emphasis, and I would use, <em
> class="foreign" lang="la">e.g.</em>, ... that.
Actually, <acronym lang="la" title="exempli gratia" >e.g.</acronym>
(maybe add "spellout" as an attribute too?)
"i.e." and "e.g." are so common in English writing that they're hardly
italicized as foreign words anymore (that is, it's a bad exampe).
Using italics for foreign words is dependent on the main language and the
language & character-set of the foreign term too. If it's an English text
with words in Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Sanskrit, Chinese, etc., then
there's no need for italics (italic/oblique is not appropriate to many
non-western character sets).
Perhaps one should use the BDO element to signal a change in language,
even though the direction may remain the same. The agent will
automatically apply default rules of style for that language if nothing
is given in a style sheet, so that an English text with non-English
words (but in a Roman script) would render them in Italic, but a
Japanese text with English words would apply different rules.
Since I (along with B and U) are being deprecated, there's a need for a
set of elements to fill the holes between I, EM, CITE, and others...
(taxonomic names, foreign words or phrases, filenames and URLs,
miscellaneous titles where CITE is awkward to use-- such as in chapters,
specific articles, videos, radio/TV programs...)
Or if no elements are added, a 'recommended usage guide' in the draft on
how to deal with some of the above cases.... otherwise most authors will
ignore the standard and continue to use the I element, deprecated or
not...
Rob