Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 18:24:00 +0200 (MET DST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst?= <email@example.com> To: Dave Raggett <firstname.lastname@example.org> cc: email@example.com In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.3.95.970922110850.-205749Hfirstname.lastname@example.org> Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970922182226.361r-100000@enoshima> Subject: Re: SCRIPT On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Dave Raggett wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, MegaZone wrote: > > > I see a potential problem with the new SCRIPT definition. > > > > 'language' has been deprecated in favor of 'type'. However, my > > understanding of type is that it does not contain version info. > > In principle, the type could include the version as a parameter > value, e.g. type="text/coolscript;version=1.8". Another possibility > is to wedge it into the name, e.g. type="text/coolscript-1.8". > The main issue is the registration of types including any > parameters. In principle this is a matter for IANA. I also thought of this. Please note that one parameter, namely "charset", is treated separately and should never be part of the "type" attribute, although it appears as a parameter in the "Content-Type" line. Regards, Martin.