Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects

Liam Quinn (liam@htmlhelp.com)
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 20:36:00 -0400


Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970910203600.008e22b0@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 20:36:00 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709101907.PAA05590@skipjack.bluecrab.org>
Subject: Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 03:07 PM 10/09/97 -0400, Marc A. Duncan wrote:
>Now I find this to be a very good idea.  I see usefulness and a desire by
>some to have <BGSOUND> or sounds included as <OBJECT> (whichever), but I
>can understand that some may not want them for whatever reason.  So, the
>most obvious resolution would be for browsers to give the user the 
ability
>to exclude the downloading of background sounds, just like they do for
>images.  This is a very sensible solution.

While we're talking about sensible solutions...  I don't think background 
sounds have a place in HTML, whether included with BGSOUND or OBJECT, 
since they're purely presentational.  Aural Cascading Style Sheets [1] 
provide a simple method of specifying a background sound for a document:

BODY { play-during: url(foo.mid) repeat }

This allows users to specify

BODY { play-during: none ! important }

in their personal style sheet if they dislike background sounds.  And 
users who want to hear some sounds but not others could selectively 
override author style sheets.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-acss

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNBc87w/JhtXygIx1AQHbBAL+K7HFpYP7Nc6nqmvxuU9gq6uHT0dnxF1N
NEKrMd0BmQyXPJV8wagg5oKmBWp/ZbpzHVLpTrPkQmn0BnEldgX78WFL2AjODRHK
ffSrsGdPwsiJXDqp+4PHAT07sIfJ/fhX
=iI9L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Liam Quinn
===============  http://www.htmlhelp.com/%7Eliam/  ===============
Web Design Group            Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development
http://www.htmlhelp.com/    http://enhanced-designs.com/
======  PGP Key at http://www.htmlhelp.com/%7Eliam/pgp.html  =====