Re: Date and time format (Was: Re: Euro currency sign)

Chris Lilley (Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr)
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:28:58 +0200 (MET)


Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:28:58 +0200 (MET)
From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
Message-Id: <9710231028.ZM1908@grommit.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: Jukka Korpela <jkorpela@cc.hut.fi>
To: Jukka Korpela <jkorpela@cc.hut.fi>, www-html@w3.org,
Subject: Re: Date and time format (Was: Re: Euro currency sign)

On Oct 23,  9:07am, Jukka Korpela wrote:

> In that draft, the datetime <i>attribute</i> of INS and DEL is required to be
> in "ISO date format", referring to ISO 8601.

My italics ;-) yes and of course it is entirely reasonable there.


> Moreover, requiring _full_ ISO date and time format, although somewhat
> inconvenient to HTML authors, is necessary to resolve ambiguities arising
> from the fact that there are different time zones. When 3rd February
> begins where I live, people in the US will still be living 2nd February.


Yes. There is still a minor item to be resolved - apparently 8601
cannot represent leap seconds - but apart from that, a single machine
readable date and time string whichh can be directly related to UTC1 is ideal.


> Naturally, authors can use whatever format they prefer in the _text_ of
> their documents.

Yes, which was the point of my earlier post.



-- 
Chris Lilley, W3C                          [ http://www.w3.org/ ]
Graphics and Fonts Guy            The World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/people/chris/              INRIA,  Projet W3C
chris@w3.org                       2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 93 65 79 87       06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France