Re(2): Euro - re-statement

Patrice.HUSSON@BXL.DG13.cec.be
Thu, 16 Oct 1997 13:07:47 +0200


From: Patrice.HUSSON@BXL.DG13.cec.be
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 13:07:47 +0200
To: Carrasco Benitez Manuel <manuel.carrasco@emea.eudra.org>
Cc: "'Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no'" <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>,
Message-ID: <WIN2359-971016110747-33D9*/G=Patrice/S=HUSSON/OU=BXL/O=DG13/PRMD=CEC/ADMD=RTT/C=BE/@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <5DFB753C1329D1119DEC00805F15C342D8C7@WS015>
Subject: Re(2): Euro - re-statement


--Boundary=_0.0_=9999990002163111
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> > I will, however, continue to object to your statement that the
> > euro *glyph* is important to Europeans.
> > [Carrasco Benitez Manuel]  
> > This is not the case.  The glyph on *itself* is very important
> > to the European Union: this is official and it has been stated
> > by the European Commission.  For the official position have
> > a look at:
> > 
> >   http://europan.eu.int/euro/
> > 
> > Regards
> > Tomas
> > 

--Boundary=_0.0_=9999990002163111
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

-------------------------------------------------------------------

btw, it's:

        http://europa.eu.int/euro/

looks very 'busy' these days...

pach
--Boundary=_0.0_=9999990002163111--